How are the presidential candidates handling "online"?

The first round of the presidential election is tomorrow, and its result will certainly be shaped in part by the candidates' online activities.

Jakub Gombár

Jakub Gombár

AI Team Leader & Co-Founder

15. March 2019

5 min

Beginner

The first round of the presidential election is tomorrow, and its result will certainly be shaped in part by the candidates' online activities. So we took a look at them…

A note:

  • We included candidates who, since the start of the year, crossed the 5% mark in at least one poll.
  • We also included Róbert Mistrík, who withdrew his candidacy, but whose campaign was prominent online and is certainly worth comparing.

The candidates' websites

We start with the classic — each candidate's website. The order is purely random. :-)

  • chmelarpreslovensko.sk
  • mistrik2019.sk
  • belabugar.sk
  • zuzanacaputova.sk
  • sefcovic2019.sk
  • prezidentpomaha.sk – Milan Krajniak's site
  • naseslovensko.net – during the campaign Marián Kotleba used the site of the ĽSNS political party
  • harabin-2019.sk
  • frantisekmiklosko.sk

Web technology

The most popular CMS is, by all appearances, WordPress. Six of our candidates use it. Milan Krajniak's site runs on Joomla, while Zuzana Čaputová and Béla Bugár have sites built bespoke with no recognisable CMS.

Pie chart of presidential candidates’ website CMS: WordPress 66%, custom 22%, Joomla 11%

Every site is responsive. The HTTPS protocol for encrypting traffic while browsing is present on every candidate's site except naseslovensko.net, which is not encrypted.

Analytics

The most commonly used tool for measuring site traffic is Google Analytics. Detailed analysis is available, once the Facebook Pixel is implemented, in the interface of the most-used social network too, and if we want to target ads at site visitors within YouTube or the Google Display Network, it is worth having the Google Ads remarketing code implemented on the site as well.

We found all three tracking codes only on Zuzana Čaputová's site. At the other end, Eduard Chmelár was the only candidate we looked at with no code implemented at all — the only one without even Google Analytics.

Pie chart of presidential candidates’ websites using Google Analytics, most of them do

Pie chart of presidential candidates’ websites using the Facebook Pixel, about a third do

Pie chart of presidential candidates’ websites using Google Ads remarketing, most do not

Using Majestic SEO we also ran a quick analysis of each candidate's link portfolio. The best results go to Marián Kotleba, who is, however, using his party's site for the campaign.

By volume of links, second place went to Maroš Šefčovič and third to Štefan Harabin. Looking at the number of domains linking to each candidate's site, the picture further down the table is more even.

Bar chart of external backlinks to presidential candidates’ websites, led by naseslovensko.net

Bar chart of referring domains for presidential candidates’ websites, led by naseslovensko.net

Spending on paid online campaigns

By examining the transparent accounts we can establish relatively precisely how much each candidate invested in online campaigns. Not all of them paid campaign costs directly to Facebook or Google. In Maroš Šefčovič's case a payment of €80,000 to an online agency can be found, which probably includes media spending on online campaigns as well.

Campaigns on Facebook and Instagram

The influence of social media on voting preferences and results became a hot and still much-debated subject, particularly after the American presidential election and the British referendum. We can expect the choice of head of state here to be no exception, and that Facebook will have a large hand in the result. The candidates are aware of it too. On the transparent accounts of five of them we clearly identified almost €200,000 in payments for Facebook ads alone, the highest of them Zuzana Čaputová's. That does not mean the other candidates did not invest in Facebook advertising.

Chart of candidates’ Facebook and Instagram ad spend, Zuzana Čaputová at €106,008

As a curiosity, going by our average figures for the last 6 months, Zuzana Čaputová could theoretically have won as many as 46,086,956 impressions of her ads on Facebook and Instagram.

Campaigns within Google Ads

Several candidates used video ads on YouTube and banner ads on the Google Display Network, though in the cases of Milan Krajniak and Maroš Šefčovič the payments did not come from the transparent account.

Chart of candidates’ Google Ads spend, Zuzana Čaputová at €105,260

Other paid online channels

Beyond the standard paid online channels, we came across paid advertising in, for instance, Maroš Šefčovič's banner campaign through the Inres ad system, though we cannot pin down its scale.

The presidential candidates' social media

Besides the size of the investment in Facebook and Instagram advertising, we also looked at other interesting metrics and at the networks the candidates were active on.

Facebook

The strongest network by candidate presence is Facebook, used for self-presentation by all nine presidential candidates we included in our overview. All the candidates gathered 291,560 likes on their Facebook pages between them. Maroš Šefčovič and Béla Bugár even have verified pages marked with the blue badge denoting official profiles of well-known figures and brands.

Milan Krajniak entered the presidential contest of Facebook pages with the highest number of likes. Over time we can observe a rise in likes for every candidate:

Line chart of Facebook page likes over time for presidential candidates

Another interesting Facebook metric to compare is "people talking about", which expresses the sum of interactions with the page — commenting, sharing, liking and others — over the last 7 days.

Chart of the Facebook people talking about metric by candidate, led by Zuzana Čaputová

We also looked more closely at the number and types of posts each candidate added to Facebook. The comparison below covers 1,592 candidate posts in total since the start of 2019.

Pie chart of candidates’ Facebook post types: images 48%, links 24%, videos 22%An overview of posts for each candidate:

Chart of the number and types of Facebook posts by each candidate

Instagram

Seven of the nine candidates we followed did not forget Instagram. We found no active profiles for Eduard Chmelár or Marián Kotleba. Activity here was far lower than on Facebook, but rose sharply as the first round of the election approached, as the following chart shows:

Chart of candidates’ Instagram posts over time, rising before the first round of the election

On Instagram, Zuzana Čaputová wins on follower count once again, with a 66% share among the candidates. The second most active candidate on Instagram is Milan Krajniak.

Chart of Instagram followers, led by Zuzana Čaputová with 25,628

YouTube

A channel used even more than Instagram was YouTube, taken up by 8 of the 9 candidates we followed. Here our statistics are again "spoiled" by Marián Kotleba, who used two YouTube channels for his communication, both bearing the name of his parliamentary party.

On their channels the candidates published mainly videos from television and radio debates, from meetings with voters, or addresses to voters. But who uploaded the most videos, won the most subscribers and the most views?

Chart of the number of videos on presidential candidates’ YouTube channels

Chart of subscribers to presidential candidates’ YouTube channels

Chart of YouTube video views, led by Milan Krajniak and Zuzana Čaputová

LinkedIn

Only Zuzana Čaputová used LinkedIn for active communication with prospective voters as well. On this professional network, with more than 500 million active users worldwide each month, we also found Maroš Šefčovič, Róbert Mistrík, Milan Krajniak and Marián Kotleba. The last two published no public posts. Maroš Šefčovič has the most followers on LinkedIn (almost 500,000), yet did not use the channel at all during the campaign.

Summary

Actively using online channels in a presidential campaign is a necessity today, and the candidates we followed have grasped it. The most prominent internet presence belongs to Zuzana Čaputová, whose team approached the online campaign very professionally — and with the largest budget. Štefan Harabin and Marián Kotleba also draw heavily on social media, with very active follower bases. We wish the candidates well in the election and are curious what presidential campaigns online will look like in 5 years' time.

sources: socialblade.com, zoomsphere.com, volby.transparency.sk, transparentneucty.sk, Facebook Public Data, Majestic SEO

Recommended reading

The latest trends, proven practices and analyses from the digital world. Find out how to take your technology and marketing growth further.